doo hee kim DEFAMATION LETTER 2009

View previous topic View next topic Go down

doo hee kim DEFAMATION LETTER 2009

Post  Internet Justice on Wed Jan 08, 2014 9:42 am

Slow Week

Author
Message  


Big Bozo

Posted 6/15/2009 7:08:06 PM      

And look at what the county clerk dropped.

Good Times







 


   


Post #75569
   



   














Post #75581
   


Big Bozo

Posted 6/16/2009 2:30:41 AM      


Everyone on this board or any other site is immune under Section 230 of Title 47 of the United States Code (47 USC § 230).
http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/47/230.html


(1) Treatment of publisher or speaker
No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.

(2) Civil liability
No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be held liable on account of—

(A) any action voluntarily taken in good faith to restrict access to or availability of material that the provider or user considers to be obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy, excessively violent, harassing, or otherwise objectionable, whether or not such material is constitutionally protected; or

(B) any action taken to enable or make available to information content providers or others the technical means to restrict access to material described in paragraph (1).



Also,


Threatening defamation litigation against websites for the critical content that users have contributed raises not just defamation issues but also questions of free speech and SLAPP (Strategic Lawsuist Against Public Participation) suits in response. Internet forum users are entitled to their opinions, and opinions are almost never probably false and therefore not defamation.


And it's not like anyone here just started posting negative posts(if there are any) out of the blue or on a whim or for personal gain. Most old postings come from arguments with MT and his camp when they were members here(before getting the boot) or from users from another board who crossed over here to express their discontent with them.
And further reading if anyone's interested
http://www.boston.com/business/globe/articles/2007/09/09/constructive_criticism/


 


   


Post #75582
   


Jack

Posted 6/16/2009 11:13:44 AM      

Probably offered to pay them with a free Bat kit.    Ask the terrible 3 how that turned out for them.  



Post #75590
   


Kevin

Posted 6/16/2009 5:32:37 PM      

Resident CLTC

The terrible three now thats funny, For those who don't know who they are. In order of their pecking order Kory Geick, Jeff Holland AKA Brin and Scott.

Post #75592

Internet Justice

Posts : 113
Join date : 2013-08-16

View user profile

Back to top Go down

View previous topic View next topic Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum